English

Español

Français

Aerospace

Automotive

Base metals

Chemical, pharmaceutical and bio-science

Energy

Glass, cement, ceramic and associated industries

ICT, electrical and electronics

Mechanical Engineering

Mining and DGOJP

Pulp and paper

Rubber

Shipbuilding and shipbreaking

Textile, garment, shoes, leather and textile services

Sectors

Action Plan 2025-2029

Action on textile and garment industry

Clean up shipbreaking

Ratify ILO C176

United for a just future - time to pay up!

Disinvest from Myanmar

Campaigns

Global Framework Agreements

Union building

White-collar workers

Health & safety

Industry 4.0

Women

Youth

LGBTQI+

Gender, equality, diversity and inclusion (GEDI)

Just Transition

Organizing with industriALL

What we do

Affiliates

Statutes

Elected Officials

Executive Committee

Geneva head office

South East Asia

Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Caucasus

Latin America and the Caribbean

Middle East and North Africa

South Asia

Sub-Saharan Africa

Regional offices

About us

Global worker No1 2022

Global worker No2 2022

Publications

Resources

Press

Mr. Andrus Ansip 
Prime Minister 
Republic of Estonia 
Tallinn 
Estonia 
 
Brussels, 20 March 2006 

Dear Prime Minister Ansip, 
 
I write on behalf of the 20-million-member ICEM, the Global Union Federation representing workers in the energy, chemicals, mining and processed industries. Estonian unions, along with Nordic IN, a five-nation trade union federation of workers in basic industries, informed us about your country&rsquo;s proposed Employees&rsquo; Representatives Act, which would replace a labour law which has been in effect since 1993. 
 
The ICEM, and its 389 trade union affiliates in 122 countries, objects to the proposed amended law as an attempt to weaken the role of trade unions in Estonia. We also view the proposal as an erosion of the role and duties that union shop stewards perform. 
 
I specifically refer to the way your government is planning to transpose a European Union directive (2002/14/EC), on informing and consulting employees, into the proposed new Estonian law. Article 1.2 of that Directive, which is also contained in ILO Convention No. 135 on Workers&rsquo; Representatives, states that information and consultation must be developed, taking into account national law and existing practices. The proposed Estonian law would exclude trade union shop stewards from these information and consultation procedures, and shop stewards would lose all their existing rights and guarantees. 
 
Furthermore, even though it is required in ILO Convention Number 98, trade union representatives would no longer have protection from dismissals. On top of that, trade union shop stewards would lose the ability to carry out their legitimate responsibilities on the job because the proposed statute significantly reduces the allowed amount of time for this to occur. 
 
In Estonia&rsquo;s 1993 statute, a well-formulated list exists of issues over which employees must be consulted. This has been changed in the proposed amendment with a short, unclear formulation. 
Additionally, the sanction or penalty for an individual employer representative who neglects the information and consultation section of this proposed law would be less than &euro; 1,000. That is about the same penalty that an employee representative would face for failing to keep confidential information. Article 8.2 of the European Directive stipulates that there should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions in the event of infringement. The ICEM feels this is not the case in the proposed Employees&rsquo; Representatives Act of Estonia. 
 
If adopted as the draft now stands, this legislation would be a major step backwards in the development of balanced labour market structures and mechanisms, as specified under the common EU social dialogue agenda.
The appointment of workplace employee representatives in parallel and alongside legitimate trade union shop stewards is directly contrary to this social model. Unfortunately, the proposed Employees&rsquo; Representatives Act would provide this option to employers doing business in Estonia. 
 
I urge you to use your influence to amend the proposed Act in such a way to ensure that the legitimate and universally accepted role of trade unions, and their elected shop stewards, is maintained. The ICEM will closely follow developments on this matter, and we intend to report directly to our affiliated trade unions on whether or not Estonia adopts the principle of a balanced social partnership between democratic and free trade unions, and employers. 
 
 
Sincerely Yours, 
 
 
Fred Higgs 
General Secretary 
ICEM

ICEM letter to Estonian Prime Minister on Employees’ Representatives Act

The FNV labour federation in The Netherlands is engaged today, 9 March, in an emergency meeting with the nation&rsquo;s tripartite Social Economic Council to address the misuse by Dutch employers of workers from Central and Eastern Europe.
<img height="53" alt="" src="" width="80" />
ICEM affiliate FNV Bondgenoten is conducting a protest outside the Council&rsquo;s building as the meeting is in progress.&nbsp;The meeting will also focus on the negative effects of a new health insurance system introduced in the country. 
Workers from Poland and other Central and Eastern European countries have flocked to The Netherlands in search of work. They have often been met by unscrupulous employers who use these workers on a term-limited contract basis, or as self-employed workers, in an effort to undermine collective bargaining agreements. The resulting payment of lower wages has a direct effect on all Dutch citizens. 
<img height="70" src="" width="120" alt="" />
FNV Bondgenoten has been successful in its &ldquo;Equal Pay for Equal Work&rdquo; campaign, which has brought union membership to a significant number of Central and Eastern European workers, particularly Poles. &ldquo;We are not against Polish workers coming to The Netherlands for employment, but we insist they be treated fairly, and so do they,&rdquo; said FNV President Agnes Jongerius.

Dutch Protest Today Points at Exploitation of Central and Eastern European Workers

Following a two-day strike on 22 and 23 February, a two-week cooling off process is now underway between ICEM Belgian affiliate ABVV-FGTB and ExxonMobil at a polymers plant near Antwerp. The entire workforce of 350 totally shut down operations at the Zwijndrecht plant in a contract dispute for a 2006-2007 renewal. 
<img height="65" alt="" src="" width="100" />
Workers were incensed at the wage offer presented to them. Also in dispute is management&rsquo;s proposal to reduce staff by increasing automation. 
Determined worker unity under the guidance of ABVV-FGTB brought the company back to the table, where a conciliator did remove some obstacles to a new agreement on 27 February, the day the two-week cooling off period took effect. Labour and management will return to talks on 14 March.

Belgian ExxonMobil Strike Over; Talks will Resume 14 March

<img height="41" alt="" src="" width="100" />
ChevronTexaco Nigeria Ltd. and one of its contractors, US-based Elper Engineering, face strike actions if the companies do not live up to terms of a collective agreement put in place five years ago. ICEM affiliate NUPENG met again last week in Nigeria with the two companies to resolve the dispute over back wages and severance, but the employers rebuffed efforts to settle the issue. 
The union declared its intent to resolve the dispute through social dialogue, but warned that NUPENG members working inside the two companies would strike if ChevronTexaco and Elper continue to avoid the issue. The two firms have granted the contractual obligation to a few employees, but have denied it to most. Contract workers at ChevronTexaco&rsquo;s massive Escravos operations in Ugborodo, Delta State, and its shallow-water platform Funiwa off Bayelsa State are affected.

Dispute Festering in Nigeria Between NUPENG, ChevronTexaco

The 19 February gas explosion that killed 65 miners at Grupo Mexico&rsquo;s Industria Mineral Mexicana subsidiary proves again the immediate necessity to improve safety and training in underground mining, particularly during times of high pricing and high demand for coal. 
 
Twenty-five of those killed at the Pasta de Conchos No. 8 mine near San Juande Sabinas, northern Coahuila State, were members of Section 13 of Mexico&rsquo;s Miners &amp; Metalworkers Union (SNTMMSRM), an affiliate of the International Metalworkers Federation (IMF). 

<img height="73" alt="" src="" width="120" />
Many others were short-term contract workers who were given no training, insufficient oxygen supply devices, and were sent deep into shafts within a day of being hired. Mexican government and company statements on safety precautions and equipment on this mine disaster contradict with what miners actually had available to them. 
 
The United Steelworkers of the US, which signed a strategic alliance with SNTMMSRM in April 2005, pledged financial and technical support to the union in the immediate aftermath of the blast. The IMF underscored the Mexican union&rsquo;s charge that this was &ldquo;industrial homicide&rdquo; and must be investigated and denounced as such. 
&ldquo;Grupo Mexico shareholders and directors and whoever is responsible for this crime, caused by greed, repression and insensitivity should be charged and punished accordingly,&rdquo; said SNTMMSRM and the IMF.

Mexican Coal Mine Blast Termed ‘Industrial Homicide’

A general strike last week by the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) and a pro-labour panel of lawmakers working inside a plenary session of South Korea&rsquo;s National Assembly blocked three bills regarding non-regular workers from reaching final approval. 
<img width="120" height="80" src="" alt="" />
The strikes, in which 300,000 workers took part, occurred on Tuesday and Thursday, 28 February and 2 March. (1 March was an official Korean holiday.) The lawmakers, primarily from the progressive Democratic Labor Party, took over a parliamentary session on 2 March to temporarily derail passage. 
 
The bills were approved by the Assembly&rsquo;s Environment and Labor Committee on 27 February, but action in the streets and inside the plenary session prevented final approval prior to the Assembly closing its session on 2 March. The issue is certain to meet further review and more public protests when the Assembly reconvenes on 20 March in an extraordinary session. 
 
The proposed legislation would do little to improve conditions for temporary and agency workers, but instead would give employers&rsquo; the flexibility to use hundreds of thousands more non-permanent workers and laying them off prior to the end of a proposed two-year period after which they must be made permanent. 
 
The ICEM congratulated KCTU on its strike and mobilisation. In an ICEM letter to KCTU President Cho Jun Ho, General Secretary Fred Higgs said it is &ldquo;of immense importance that the main issue of your struggle is defending the basic rights of contract and agency workers. The substitution or limiting of permanent direct employment has clearly become a priority issue for countless workers and their trade unions, in every region of the world and every sector.&rdquo;

Korean Temp Worker Bills Blocked for Now

<img height="40" alt="" src="" width="100" />
Oil workers in southern Iraq conducted a one-day strike 21 February as grievance to the Oil Ministry&rsquo;s neglect for work conditions and the infrastructure of the company. The strike at the Oil Transport Company of Basra was brought by the General Union of Oil Employees (GUOE) in Basra. 
The strike took place due to the deliberate and targeted neglect of the transport company by the ministry and government; for improvements in workers&rsquo; living conditions; and as a demand to pay money promised to workers by the Oil Ministry but never paid.

Iraqi Oil Workers Strike Oil Ministry in Basra

Meeting in Istanbul on 6 and 7 April, delegates at the ICEM&rsquo;s 3rd World Conference for the Rubber Industries ended two days of discussions and information exchange on Friday with the adoption of a plan for action. 
<img height="120" alt="" src="" width="120" />
Topics at the conference included current world-wide trends in the rubber industries, one of the most oligopolistic industrial sectors, and their effect on workers, as well as the need for multinational companies to guarantee respect for national and international workers&rsquo; rights. The conference was attended by over 100 representatives from 16 ICEM affiliated rubber sector trade unions from 14 countries. 
 
At the conference, two special resolutions were adopted. The first one dealt with the recently announced Goodyear plant closures in the UK and Poland, declaring international solidarity support towards the Goodyear workers in those countries. 
<img height="213" alt="" src="" width="390" />
The second resolution calls on Goodyear, Bridgestone and Pirelli to &ldquo;exert common sense and to bargain in good faith&rdquo; with Turkey&rsquo;s ICEM affiliate Lastik-Iş. These three companies take a very harsh approach to collective bargaining in Turkey. They are not only demanding concessions in working conditions, they have also consistently called on the Turkish government to ban strikes, while simultaneously threatening to leave the country. 
 
The conference adopted an action plan for the next four years, setting out broad guidelines for international trade union action at both national and international level. An important priority in the action plan is the need for continued and improved dialogue with multinational companies in the rubber sector, including through global framework agreements and global trade union networks. Special emphasis also goes to health and safety issues. 
Other priority areas are the difficulties related to the increased use of contract and agency labour and the fight for gender equality. 
 
Leo Gerard, International President of ICEM&rsquo;s US affiliate USW (United Steelworkers), was re-elected as Chair of the ICEM rubber section. 
 
Speaking at the conclusion of the conference, ICEM general secretary Fred Higgs said that &ldquo;The discussions, resolutions and adoption of a forward looking action plan by the conference demonstrates that unions around the world in the rubber sector are determined to meet the challenges of a rapidly changing industry on the basis of mutual support and solidarity&rdquo;. 
 
 

For the resolution on the Goodyear plant closings in the UK and Poland, <a href="/index.php?id=164&amp;doc=1754&amp;la=EN">click here</a>. 
 
For the resolution on collective bargaining in Turkey, <a href="/index.php?id=164&amp;doc=1750&amp;la=EN">click here</a>.&nbsp;
For more information on this conference, including background documents and presentations, <a href="/index.php?id=164&amp;la=EN">click here</a>.

ICEM’s World Rubber Conference Reacts to the Challenges of Globalisation

BAE, Kang-wook 
President 
Korean Chemical and Textile Workers Federation (KCTF) 
Third floor, Woosung Building 
94-14 Yeongdeungpo-dong 7-ga 
Yeongdeungpo 
Seoul 150-037 
SOUTH KOREA 
 
by fax: + 82-2-26.32.47.55 
by&nbsp;e-mail: <a href="mailto:kctfim@hanmail.net">kctfim@hanmail.net</a> 

Dear Sisters and Brothers of KCTF-KCTU in Korea, 
 
We are informed by the ICEM that your union has been, since 2004, the victim of an anti-union repression by GS Caltex, and that you now have decided to launch a boycott campaign against GS Caltex products in Korea. This letter is meant to offer our union&rsquo;s support and encouragement in your courageous fight against the unfair labor practices by GS Caltex. 
 
We understand that some 30 union leaders at GS Caltex have been dismissed in August 2004 and that eight have faced criminal charges for carrying out their legitimate union duties. It is clear that GS Caltex wanted to punish these dedicated trade unionists, as well as the KCFT-KCTU itself, for its trade union actions. This behavior by the company is abhorrent and far from what can and should be expected in developed and civilized nations. GS Caltex needs to start bargaining in good-faith. 
 
It is also deplorable that the South Korean Government has collaborated with the management of GS Caltex by assisting in the suppression of reasonable union demands through dispatching anti-riot police units and arresting union members. 
 
We salute KCFT-KCTU for undertaking this brave struggle in defense of basic trade union rights, particularly the fight for freedom of association. Please know that the members and leaders of our union stand firmly with you in your pursuit of justice and dignity. 
 
Fraternally, 
 
 
(Name) 
(Title) 
(Union)

Model Letter of Support to KCTF

<img height="40" alt="" src="" width="100" />
In Peru, 800 iron ore miners, members of Sindicato de Obreros Mineros, an affiliate of Federaci&oacute;n Nacional de Trabajadores Mineros, Metalurgicos y Siderurgicos del Peru (FNTMMSP) began a strike 19 June against Chinese state-run Shouda Iron and Steel Group (Shougang). 
 
The strike at Peru&rsquo;s only iron ore mine at Marcona, 350 kilometres south of Lima, was caused when managers of Shougang Hierro Peru failed to meet wage demands of miners, who are among the lowest paid in the country&rsquo;s mining industry.
<img height="100" alt="" src="" width="100" />
The mine union, connected with ICEM affiliate FNTMMSP, is seeking wage increases equivalent of US$1.69-a-day, while Shougang offered only the equivalent of US$0.42-a-day. Shougang&rsquo;s miners earn a salary of only US$13-a-day, far below the average Peruvian mining salary of US$33-a-day, according to Peru&rsquo;s National Society of Mining, Petroleum and Energy. 
 
Union members at the mine last week blocked the entrance, preventing the company from using contract work to continue the work. Meanwhile, Peru&rsquo;s government has declared the strike a legal one, meaning the company must continue negotiating with the union and the Labour Ministry can impose an increase to workers&rsquo; salaries if work is to be re-started. 
 
Shougang declared force majeure on all iron ore exported from Peru, the majority of which is destined for Japan and China. The Chinese state company bought the mine in 1992 from a state-run Peruvian company for US$118 million, and has increased production since 2002 by an average of 20% per annum. 
The increased production has caused numerous safety concerns, which have not been addressed, and Peru&rsquo;s Energy and Mines Ministry says the company has not met investment commitments tied to the sale.

Miners Strike Chinese Iron Ore Operations in Peru

Archive